Proof Wade Robson is Lying?

According to TMZ this morning, Mr. Wade Robson's lawyer claims that Robson had a breakdown in 2011 (or March 2012, as TMZ has changed it to) and began seeing a psychiatrist, where all of his repressed memories came flooding back.  Ok.  But here is a video taken in JULY 2012 in which Mr. Robson speaks about Michael Jackson...and there is absolutely no shred of fear or anger or anything that a victim may feel toward their abuser.  Why is he so calm and happy talking about Michael Jackson if he has already remembered his repressed memories?  Makes no sense, does it?

 

In my opinion, Mr. Robson should be ashamed of himself for turning his back on his friend at a time like this.  Quite convenient that it comes just as his family is locked in a court battle with AEG, isn't it?  Michael's 2005 lawyer Thomas Mesereau has already pointed out that Wade was one of the star witnesses at the 2005 molestation trial.  He testified under oath that Mr. Jackson never behaved inappropriately with him, and now that he's saying otherwise, he has said that he didn't remember Michael abused him until after he had a nervous breakdown and started to lose substantial amounts of money and suddenly remembered those repressed memories.  Sounds awfully convenient, doesn't it?

Not only is he trying to further tarnish the reputation of one of America's greatest legendary performers, he is using something as serious as child molestation allegations to try and make a creditor's claim with the Jackson estate.  What about the thousands of children all over the country and the world who are actually being abused and molested?  This is making a mockery of it all.  There was and is zero evidence against Mr. Jackson, and Wade's own words helped clear his name in 2005.  

One has to wonder if Mr. Robson's financial situation perhaps played a part in why he is now completely changing his tune about his dead friend.  Why now?  What's the point?  All he is trying to do now is take money away from Michael's innocent children.  If Robson was truly abused, why did did he not speak up a year ago?  Why did he not say anything the moment these so-called repressed memories came out?  Why put his children through the humiliation of having their dead father's name further dragged through the mud at the opportunity to make some money?  Is AEG behind this in an attempt to sway the outlook of the jury that is deciding if they are partially responsible for Michael Jackson's death?

According to one of Robson's attorneys, Helen Yu, Robson and AEG have had no contact.  But anybody can say anything anymore.  I believe Robson's original testimony and the video he made in summer of 2012 is MORE than telling than his recent allegations.  

What do you think?

Michael Jackson Accused by Former Pal Wade Robson

I am so disgusted this morning.  Former pal of Michael Jackson, choreographer Wade Robson, has filed a creditor's claim with the Jackson estate citing childhood sexual abuse.  Get this, rumor has it, he's going to say he repressed the memories of the abuse.  Nice excuse, given he vigorously defended Michael Jackson during the 2005 molestation trial, repeatedly stating that Michael never abused him.  He was questioned back in 1993.  Robson was cross-examined by Zonen, and one would think that such a grilling would have been traumatic to an abuse victim, perhaps unrepressing those repressed memories.

It's highly questionable that this young man would come forward NOW, just when his family is in a court battle for 40 billion dollars with AEG.

Wade, his mother Joy, and his sister have always had glowing comments of the late music legend.  So it is understandable that this claim would completely set people spinning.

In a book released after Michael's death, the Official Michael Jackson Opus, Robson wrote a heartfelt and emotional letter about his late friend.  Here it is for you:

My Mentor by Wade Robson

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab2/drgps51/mjrobson.jpg


I used to talk to Michael for three hours a day. I never really worked out how he came to find so much time because he seemed so busy, but he would ring me and we would talk and talk and talk. When he got a cell phone he would call and text all the time. It was part of an amazing friendship that lasted for 20 years.

I had first met Michael when he was kicking off his bad tour in 1987. I was five, but Michael's company were holding a dance competition in every country and I entered the one in Brisbane. I remember being a kid and dancing to his video- the first ever I say was "Thriller" when I was two. It was my mum's tape and I just went nuts over it. I used to run into the kitchen scared every time the werewolf came on. By the time I was three I had pretty much learned its entire choreography.

I ended up winning the dance competition. We went to see Michael in Brisbane and at a meet and greet i was introduced to him. I remember wearing a custom made outfit from "Bad"- my mum's belt was wrapped around me, like five times. Michael was impressed and asked me if I had danced. I told him that I did and he said " Do you want to perform with me in the show tomorrow night?"

I couldn't believe it. He was due to play Brisbane the next night. His idea was for me to come out for the last song of the show which was "Bad". He was bringing on some orphaned children so he figured it would be cool to bring me out in the full "Bad" outfit. At the end of the song we were all onstage- Stevie Wonder was there too and Michael came on and said "Come on". I took it as him meaning "Get into it!".I moved downstage and threw my hat into the crowd and started going crazy. When i turned around Michael was saying goodbye to the crowd, the other kids were gone and Stevie Wonder was being escorted off. What he meant was "Come on lets go, It's over".

When I realized, I ran off. After my mum and I spent two hours with Michael into his hotel and we became friends. He showed us clips from the new Moonwalker he was working on and we talked and talked. We didn't really stay in contact but i joined a dance company- literally the next day and two years later I was in America to play at Disneyland. I got in touch with Michael through his people, he remembered me. Me and my family went to Record One Studio where he was mixing the Dangerous Album. I showed him some of my dance videos and he said to me. "Do you and your family want to come to Neverland tonight"? We all agreed and ended up staying for two weeks.

Our friendship blossomed. For two weeks he'd take me into his dance studio, put some music on and we'd dance and jam for hours.We'd sit there and watch films like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.Other time we'd just leave Neverland and drive out in a car, blasting music really loud.

He even taught me how to do the moonwalk.We were in his dance studio. He taught me foot by foot. I couldn't sleep that whole night. The thrill of pushing off the bar and sliding backwards in a moonwalk with the guy that made it famous was so exciting.

Later, me and my mum wanted to move to America to pursue my dreams of becoming a dancer and he helped us out. He gave me a big start by putting me in some of his videos like "Black or White". The role he took on was one of a mentor.

He told me when I was seven that I'd be a film director and that's what I became, he created a thirst for knowledge in me. Once, a mini recording studio turned up on my doorstep, but what was cool was that he stopped me from becoming a spoiled brat. He would say "This is for you, but I want to see you do something with it. Don't take it for granted or I''ll take it back".

The last time I saw him was in July 2008. I was in Vegas working on a show and he was living there. Me, my wife and him and his three kids had a barbecue. It was the most normal thing in the world. Me and my wife had been to Whole foods and bought stuff to cook. But when we got there he'd provided loads of catering. I said, "Dude, Why did you bring loads of catering? We've got regular food here". I remember cooking outside while Michael sat there under an umbrella.

We had great times because he was such a caring person. Most of all I'll miss those phone conversations. I still have my mobile phone with his number on it. I just cant bear the thoughts of deleting his messages.

Michael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of human kind. He was a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk.

I love you Michael.

- Wade Robson

Letter found on the following website: 



http://michaeljacksonvindication2.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-wade-robson-part-1-of-5/


Does that sound like someone who was ever abused?  How does Robson expect anybody to believe that this man he writes about ever abused him?


Several sources are using Blanca Francia's claims that she saw the two showering together in the 90s to back up their beliefs that Robson is telling the truth. However, Francia was discredited on the witness stand, not to mention Robson denied any wrong doing on Michael's part.  One would thing the questioning alone would jog a victim's memories.  Not only did he defend Michael, but he waited nearly 4 years after Michael's death to say anything at all.  This leads me to believe that it is soley about MONEY MONEY MONEY.


Until sufficient evidence is shown to prove Michael Jackson did these horrific things, I will continue to believe in his innocence.  To this day there is still zero evidence against him.  I am relieved that this time, he is not here to hear or see these things that are happening.  I only hope that his children will come out of this all unscathed.  I cannot imagine what it must be like for them right now to hear these awful things said about their loving father.

Mark Lester Continues to Seek Attention, Claims All 3 of Michael Jackson's Children

Mark Lester is running to the tabloids again.  He's seeking more attention, possibly because of the new stories of Paris hanging out with her mother, Debbie Rowe.  Maybe he wants in on the attention.  Who knows?  Once again, he is claiming to be the biological father of Michael Jackson's three children. That's right.  All three of them. Vitiligo-having Prince and mini-Michael Blanket.

The Mirror wasn't dumb enough to put up a comparison of Lester and Blanket, so I'll do the honors:

 

Yep, Blanket sure has him...um....well....I give up.

Now he's not just using his daughter Harriet to try and show the "comparisons" but he's using his daughter Olivia.  Here is the hilarious comparison.

Yeah, he was closer with comparing Harriet to Paris, since Harriet bears a slight resemblance to Debbie Rowe.  Honestly though, does Lester really expect that his fair-skinned children really share genetic ties with these children who all are naturally tanned with dark hair and dark eyes (except green-eyed Paris who gets those from grandpa Joe?)

 

Check out this childhood photo of Michael and Paris with Lester and his children.  See that olive-skinned with the curly hair out front who makes all the other children look very pale?  Yep, that's little Paris!

Here are Paris and Prince next to Harriet in London in 2009.  Harriet is the girl with long blonde hair and wearing blue.  Paris and Prince are the children who are at least 3 to 4 shades darker in skin tone than this girl.  Heck, even Paris looks pale compared to Prince in those photos.  And look how dark they look surrounded by actual white people.

Now does Mark Lester really expect us to believe that while he produced his children with his white wife who looked like this:

he'd turn around and produce three children, all with naturally tanned skin, two of which conceived with Debbie Rowe, who if you remember, looks like this:

Still believe that Lester could be the father?  Check out this website for a run down of Lester's history with lying.  Oh, and check out the deets on some of the other paternity-bidders, Arnold Klein and Matt Fiddes.

This is the man who said that Michael told him nothing about Blanket being on the way.  Did he really expect that Michael would save his sperm for years just to conceive another child...one that this time is even more dark in features than the previous two children?

I would also like to know how Lester explains the eldest child having the same genetic skin condition as Michael Jackson.  It would be an interesting read, that's for sure.  I'm just waiting for Lester to come out and reveal he has vitiligo, too, because at this point, I really wouldn't put it past him.

Paris Jackson and Debbie Rowe Reunited

Michael Jackson's 15 year old daughter is bonding with her mother.  Having been raised primarily by her biological father, Michael Jackson, Paris is now reconnecting with her mother, Debbie Rowe, who maintained a life outside of the spotlight for several years.  Sadly, now, she is being followed by paparazzi on simple outings with her daughter. 

A photo of Paris and Debbie made the rounds on the web this week showing the two posed for a snap on Paris' 15th birthday.

The web has been abuzz with talk since the photo hit the web, many making horrid remarks about Debbie's character, her appearance, and her motives.  Sadly, nobody can just be happy that mother and daughter are developing a relationship. 

Everyone has gotten so bent out of shape, thinking Michael wouldn't want this or he wouldn't want that.  But the simple truth is that Michael knew Debbie long before they ever talked of having babies or getting married.  Contrary to reports, Debbie did not meet Michael when he and Lisa were having marriage problems.  They met in the 80s and developed a friendship during Michael's treatments for vitiligo.

Here is a photo of them backstage of Michael's Dangerous Tour circa 1992 or 1993, before Michael and Lisa even married.

They looked very comfortable with one another here.  I do believe there was far more than business agreements between the two, but I'm not going to go into that. 

The hatred still being slung by the media toward Michael, his children and Debbie Rowe is appalling.  As Debbie Rowe once said in an interview:


'"We have a non-traditional family and if it makes people uncomfortable it's a shame that they are not more open. We are a family unit. Michael and I will always be connected with the kids. I will always be there for him. I will always be there for the children and people make remarks, "I can't believe she left her children. Left them? I left my children? I did not leave my children.  My children are with their father, where they are supposed to be. I didn't do it to be a mother."'

That was years ago, and Michael said in the Bashir documentary that Debbie "couldn't handle it."  But she is human and she and Michael made a fantastic deal, seeing as the kids had a wonderful father and were given a very privileged upbringing.  But neither of them expected him to die so soon, and I think it's great that Debbie and Paris are forming a relationship.  I fully believe Debbie left the children with Michael out of love, knowing he desired to be a father so.  But he is no longer here, and I don't think he would begrudge his daughter spending time with her own mother, seeing as it is something both of them seem to be happy in doing.  Most of all, Michael would want his children to be happy.

Michael Jackson Was a Human Being

With this AEG trial coming up fast, so many stories are getting slung left and right about Michael Jackson.  Facts are being twisted and flat out made up.  Lies are being distributed as facts.  Michael Jackson as a father is once again being questioned.  Rumor has it that the Jacksons are nervous about the possibility of Debbie Rowe testifying on the stand, as they wonder what she may reveal about the paternity of Michael Jackson's oldest two children, whom she gave birth to and is the biological mother of.

Just days ago, La Toya Jackson mentioned how the family is OK with Paris bonding with her mother.  Now stories are coming out that this isn't the case.  Whatever is going on, one thing remains clear:  Debbie Rowe has always maintained that Michael Jackson was the biological father of his children. 

 

Debbie's lawyer in the custody case years back even said he was 100% the biological father of the children.  Why would Debbie's lawyer say that if it wasn't true?

I'm reading now about how Paris spending time with her mother is going against her father's wishes.  Like how?  Michael never spoke negatively of Debbie.  Debbie was the one who decided to give up visitation.  It wasn't that she abandoned the children. Not at all.

I am STILL reading ridiculous comments all over the place about how Michael hated his race because he got white kids and turned himself white.  He didn't turn himself white.  Alright, he did do depigmentation in order to even out the splotches caused by vitiligo, but that does not mean he was trying to be white.  He never once did or said anything that would mean he hated his race.  He called himself a proud black man.  He stood up for the rights of blacks, and he donated millions to help all kinds of people, including African and black children.

The man had a skin condition. He could not help that.  People need to remember that this man was a human being, and this man had 3 children who are very much aware of who their father was and what people are saying about him.  Respect that he was a person with feelings.  Stop buying into the tabloid lies.

Regardless of Paternity, Michael Jackson’s Children Are His

Regardless of Paternity, Michael Jackson’s Children Are His

My oh my, I have read some “interesting” opinions on the Internet over the last few days.  Everybody has been giving their two cents on the situation regarding the alleged “evidence” AEG has about the paternity of Michael Jackson’s children.  I seriously doubt any of this will be brought up, but for a moment, let us discuss the legality of it all.

Michael Jackson did NOT adopt his children, ok? If he had, there would be paperwork out there to prove that he had.  When Michael Jackson was being investigated for child molestation back in 2003, does anyone actually believe the children would have remained in his care had he not legally been their father?  If they were not his children, and he hadn’t adopted them, the kids would have been moved out of his care faster than anything else.

Michael’s name is on the children’s birth certificates.  All three of them. This is easily seen via google.  In the eyes of the law, Michael Jackson is their father.  Prince and Paris were born during his marriage to Debbie Rowe.  There is no disputing him as father, as he is listed on the birth certificates.  The situation with Blanket is different, because he wasn’t born into a marriage.  But Michael’s name is on the birth certificate, and nobody ever contested this.  Nobody every came forward claiming to be his father until long after Michael Jackson died, when Blanket was seven or eight.

Everyone keeps saying that if it’s proven Michael isn’t their biological father, they won’t inherit his money.  Bollocks.  Michael was their legal father.  He was legally responsible for them, and, biological or not, the children are his true heirs.  It doesn’t matter if he was their biological parent or not.  No judge out there is going to rule that three children raised from birth by this man, with his name on their birth certificates, cannot inherit the money left to them in his will.

I have also read some interesting theories on the heritage of these children.  Let me tell you, it’s pretty funny.  I have read everything from “Debbie Rowe isn’t the biological mother.  She was just the surrogate.” Oh really?

I have heard that Prince can’t possibly be Michael’s.  Oh really?  How does one overlook something such as a genetic skin condition, one both he has and his father had? If Michael Jackson isn’t that young man’s biological father, I’ll eat my left shoe.  Genetic conditions are far more telling than the color of one’s skin or the texture of one’s hair.  Speaking of hair textures, here is a recent picture of 16-year-old Prince with dark, curly hair. By the way…does that smile remind you of anyone?

 

People seem to forget what Michael really looked like.  Prince has the same jawline, though he has Debbie Rowe’s chin.  He has the same shaped nose, only not quite as large.  He has the same mouth and smile.  I don’t see any similarities between Prince and Arnold Klein, who is a short, light-brown-haired, light-brown eyed, pale man with thin lips and a thin nose and nothing in common with Prince besides light skin, and Prince’s is actually darker.

Prince has Debbie Rowe's eye shape, and he has Michael Jackson's eye color.  He has Debbie Rowe's chin but Michael Jackson's jaw.  He has Michael's smile and Michael's nose, only on a smaller scale.  Most importantly of all, he has Michael Jackson's genetic skin condition, vitiligo.

 

But at the end of the day, paternity is not what is important.  It is who raised and loved those children, and that is Michael Jackson.  He consistently maintained that he was the biological father, and not only that, Debbie Rowe did, too.  She never once said he was not the biological father, and I think that counts for something, too.  

I don't know why the media is so fixed on picking at these children's looks and their paternity.  It's not fair to them to say "he wasn't your REAL dad" because for all intents and purposes, he was.  I wish people would stop making fun of these children and making light of something so important, their relationship with their father.  It is cruel and unfair.  It needs to stop.

More Media Lies About Michael Jackson and His Kids

Well, here we go again.  Yesterday, Michael Jackson's only daughter, fifteen-year-old Paris-Michael was featured in an interview with Daily Mail's Event Magazine.  In it, she spoke about her wonderful father, and how he tried his best to protect them and give them as normal a childhood as possible despite the fact that he was an entertainer, if not the biggest entertainer of all time.  In it, she spoke of her love for her father and her dreams of wanting to help children like her father did.  She spoke of wanting to be a heart surgeon and wanting to restore Neverland for under privileged children.  These are not the goals and dreams of someone who was raised by a lunatic, as some media outlets may want you to believe.  Michael was a very good father, and that is demonstrated time and time again in the maturity and poise in which his children speak of him and speak of their own goals.

On the heels of such a positive interview, it was inevitable that the media start running around with the paternity rumors again.  Of course, one of the first out the gate was FORMER (his own words) Jackson family friend Stacy Brown.

AEG lawsuit could reveal that only one of Michael Jackson's kids is biologically his

I don't even know where to begin with the problems in this article.  First of all, it was Katherine Jackson, not AEG, who first brought up paternity.  She is the one who filed the papers asking that paternity not be brought up.  Now, Brown says that AEG is demanding they be allowed to show proof of paternity on Michael's eldest two children so that it will play a part in showing that Michael wasn't always forthcoming about certain things.  Basically, he's saying they want to say that him lying about his children shows a pattern in the way he dealt with people, such as lying about drug use.  What the hell?

Ok, there is zero proof that Michael wasn't the biological father.  If there was any, it would have come out at such momentous occasions like the investigation for child molestation back in 2003 or when he passed away in 2009 and it was up in the air as to who would care for the three.

Also, during Conrad Murray's trial, it was pretty much shown that addiction is not what killed Michael.  Murray's incompetent actions are what killed him.  Michael's autopsy showed a HEALTHY 50 year old male, not the ravaged organs of a long-term drug abuser.

Brown's article goes on to say that Blanket's paternity isn't being questioned, because he looks like Michael, sings and dances like him. Brown writes that Arnold Klein has claimed Prince and Paris, Mark Lester has claimed Paris, and Matt Fiddes has claimed Paris.  SAY WHAT?

Matt Fiddes Vows to Take Legal Action to Prove He's Blanket's Real Father

Matt Fiddes NEVER claimed Paris.  Matt Fiddes is the martial arts instructor who said that he fathered Blanket.  He contradicted himself over the years, first saying that he donated sperm but never asked if Michael used it, then later saying that he flat out asked Michael if he (Fiddes) was the biological father, and Michael told him yes.

Remember this gem of a comparison?

Yeah, I do, too.  Because it was so laughable. 

Brown also writes that Blanket is being treated for a similar skin condition, noting Michael's vitiligo:

"Blanket has even been treated for similar medical problems, including a skin condition, a family source told The Post. Jacko suffered from a disorder called vitiligo."

Another laugh.  Michael Jackson had vitiligo, yes.  It was indicated in his autopsy report.  But it is not Blanket who has vitiligo.  It was his older brother, Michael Jackson Jr.

Various family members have confirmed this, as have insiders such as Rabbi Boteach who mentioned the splotches on Prince way back in 2001 or so.  What is the point in reporting something such as this?  Why say Blanket has the condition when it is clearly Prince?  This is ridiculous.

Honestly, I think it's time the Jackson family does a paternity test, just to put to rest the rumors. I believe 100% that Michael fathered his children, and those children do not owe ANYONE an explanation.  But it's time to stop the rumors, because it is not ok to constantly criticize Michael for "buying white children" when there is no proof of that.  It is not ok to call these children "white" when they aren't 100% white.  It's not ok to cast doubt on these kids, simply because their skin isn't black enough.  These kids should not be hounded all throughout their life with stories about their paternity.  It's time to put a stop to it.

I realize there are people out there who would never believe a DNA test, since they don't even believe Michael had vitiligo, despite the fact that it was confirmed via autopsy.  But a DNA test should at least be enough to shut up most of the hateful, hurtful comments directed at these children because of the color of their skin.